5/9/2023 0 Comments Newest version of quicktime![]() Fermi would have to move out of the way if the threat failed to recede. The update on Friday, March 30, indicated that the satellites would occupy the same point in space within 30 milliseconds of each other. With a speed relative to Fermi of 27,000 mph, a direct hit by the 3,100-pound Cosmos 1805 would release as much energy as two and a half tons of high explosives, destroying both spacecraft. The uncertainties in predicting spacecraft positions a week into the future can be much larger than the distances forecast for their closest approach. The two objects, speeding around Earth at thousands of miles an hour in nearly perpendicular orbits, were expected to miss each other by a mere 700 feet.Īlthough the forecast indicated a close call, satellite operators have learned the hard way that they can't be too careful. ![]() On scanning the document, she discovered that Fermi was just one week away from an unusually close encounter with Cosmos 1805, a dead Cold-War era spy satellite. While Fermi is in fine shape today, continuing its mission to map the highest-energy light in the universe, the story of how it sidestepped a potential disaster offers a glimpse at an underappreciated aspect of managing a space mission: orbital traffic control.Īs McEnery worked through her inbox, an automatically generated report arrived from NASA's Robotic Conjunction Assessment Risk Analysis (CARA) team based at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. But when Julie McEnery, the project scientist for NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, checked her email on March 29, 2012, she found herself facing this precise situation. ![]() NASA scientists don't often learn that their spacecraft is at risk of crashing into another satellite.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |